<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian Wahl Band &#187; Guitars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianwahlband.com/category/blog/gear/guitars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com</link>
	<description>Acoustic Rock</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gear: Martin D-35</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/05/29/gear-martin-d-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/05/29/gear-martin-d-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guitars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is kind of a follow-up to the &#8220;Stuff I want: Martin Acoustic&#8221; post.  I guess I wanted one bad enough that I bought one.
A few weeks ago I stumbled upon a used D-35 in a local shop. The word &#8220;used&#8221; is a stretch, as this thing has hardly a scratch on it. Virtually no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is kind of a follow-up to the &#8220;<a href="http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/2009/04/24/stuff-i-want-martin-acoustic-guitar/">Stuff I want: Martin Acoustic</a>&#8221; post.  I guess I wanted one bad enough that I bought one.</p>
<p>A few weeks ago I stumbled upon a used D-35 in a local shop. The word &#8220;used&#8221; is a stretch, as this thing has hardly a scratch on it. Virtually no fret wear. I&#8217;ve seen many, many guitars hanging on the wall at Guitar Center in worse shape.</p>
<p>Well, I played it for a while &#8211; realizing that, yes, I really do love the Martin sound. I was trying to decide whether I really wanted a Martin or a Taylor &#8211; Martin all the way.</p>
<p>I went back to the shop about a week later and put it on layaway. Got it for $1600, by the way. Not the best deal ever, but this one seemed to have something special &#8211; at least it spoke to me. That was two long weeks ago, and today I brought it home. Another hobby of mine happens to be photography, so here is some eye candy:</p>
<p><iframe width="540" height="500" src="http://www.flickr.com/slideShow/index.gne?set_id=72157618698990823" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>And a bit of a mini-review:</p>
<p><strong>Sound:</strong> I&#8217;m used to my <a href="http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/">Takamine FD-360sc</a>, which is a very nice high-end Takamine. Both guitars are solid spruce top/rosewood back and sides. The Takamine&#8217;s sound is very even and balanced, and a bit on the bright side. When I play these two guitars back-to-back, the Tak just sounds really thin in comparison. The Martin is very warm, and has a beautiful full bottom end that the Takamine just doesn&#8217;t have. Very round sound, too. With new strings, it&#8217;s bright, but it&#8217;s top end still maintains the warm character. Another thing it trumps the Takamine on is punch. If you dig into the Martin, it punches &#8211; hard. It fits my playing style very well (mostly strumming with a pick). When I was comparing to the Taylors (a 414ce), the Taylor sound was nice, but it&#8217;s very bright and jangly. They&#8217;ve got a good bass response, but the overall brightness of the tone wasn&#8217;t what I was going for. Again, the warmth of the Martin won me over.</p>
<p><strong>Playability:</strong> This one was set up with a bit lower action that most factory Martin set-ups I&#8217;ve played. It&#8217;s perfect for my style, as it is pretty easy to chord, but I can strum hard and it doesn&#8217;t buzz. You could probably lower the action a bit if you wanted to. The neck has a satin finish (rest of the guitar is gloss). It seems to get a bit sticky, so I&#8217;ll have to get used to that. The shape of the neck is really nice. Thicker than my Takamine which is good &#8211; I like thick necks &#8211; this is totally a personal preference thing, though. It&#8217;s not quite as comfy in my hands as a Taylor neck, or, say, a vintage Telecaster neck, but it&#8217;s nice. Intonation is as good as any acoustic I&#8217;ve played &#8211; pretty much right on. Another thing, I&#8217;m used to acoustic with cut-aways, and I do play up pretty high on the fretboard sometimes. Another thing I&#8217;ll have to get used to. 90% of the time it won&#8217;t be an issue for me.</p>
<p><strong>Looks/Build:</strong> To me it looks like a guitar should &#8211; simple and elegant. It&#8217;s got a bit of &#8220;bling&#8221; for a Martin, which isn&#8217;t much bling for most manufactures. I like the binding up the neck, and the ornamentation around the sound hole looks classy. The 3-piece back looks awesome, in my opinion. Build quality is as you would expect from a Martin of this caliber &#8211; I&#8217;m not going to worry about it breaking down on me. Also &#8211; I&#8217;ve always loved the look of ebony on the fretboard/bridge. One more thing &#8211; I tend to break a lot of strings. I think I&#8217;d describe my style as &#8220;strum hard and sing harder&#8221;. Hopefully the saddle on this is well-made, as I&#8217;m sure it is. Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/05/29/gear-martin-d-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gear: Takamine FD-360sc</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is my beloved Takamine FD-360sc.  I bought this acoustic back in 2001, which makes it a 2000 model, I think.  I was in college at the time, and I saved long and hard for this.  I remember I had a buddy who had a nice Takamine, and I would always go over to his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my beloved Takamine FD-360sc.  I bought this acoustic back in 2001, which makes it a 2000 model, I think.  I was in college at the time, and I saved long and hard for this.  I remember I had a buddy who had a nice Takamine, and I would always go over to his dorm room and play it.</p>
<p>First, here are some photos:</p>
<p><iframe width="540" height="500" src="http://www.flickr.com/slideShow/index.gne?set_id=72157601576930749" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p><span id="more-161"></span>I love this guitar.  If there were a fire in my house, I&#8217;d probably run in after it.  You can see this thing in action in most of my vidoes.</p>
<p>Here are a few spec&#8217;s:</p>
<p>Top:  Spruce (solid)<br />
Back/Sides:  Rosewood (solid)<br />
Fretboard:  Rosewood<br />
Electronics:  Takamine AD-1 Digital system</p>
<p>And a bit of a review&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Sound</strong>: I love the sound &#8211; I would describe it as clear, slightly bright, and very balanced. The bass tones and the treble tones mix perfectly, in my opinion. It&#8217;s fairly loud &#8211; good projection. It is really a joy to play and hear &#8211; one of those acoustics that is inspiring to play.</p>
<p><strong>Playability</strong>: The neck is on the thinner side. This is a preference thing, but I&#8217;m used to it and like it. It is very comfy. The rosewood board on this thing is awesome. Very tight grain and feels nice and smooth &#8211; a bit of a soft feel to it, but not slow. I&#8217;ve cleaned it with 000 steel wool and oiled it with lemon oil every 9 months to a year &#8211; it&#8217;s a great neck. I&#8217;ve set it up for the style that I play. The action is low &#8211; but not really low. I&#8217;m a strummer, so I like the action just a tad higher than some. Intonation is perfect.</p>
<p><strong>Build quality</strong>. I just gave this guitar a cleaning and fretboard conditioning the other day &#8211; and I once again gave it a thorough inspection. I simply cannot find one flaw in it at all &#8211; besides the ones I&#8217;ve put in it myself. The wood grain is perfect &#8211; none of the sanding marks I can see on my Fender Tele. The double binding is flawless. Joints are perfect. No visible glue. It is an example of great craftsmanship. One thing I&#8217;ve always loved about it is the weight. I&#8217;ve picked up some guitars that just felt like a bag of bricks. This one is nice and light &#8211; not too light. It can feel a bit on the &#8220;delicate&#8221; side, but not too much so. Just enough that you want to treat it with care.</p>
<p><strong>Electronics</strong>. Everybody says that Takamine&#8217;s are built to be plugged in. This one is no exception (though it sounds better unplugged, in my opinion). It&#8217;s got some fancy electronics on it, allowing you to adjust feedback response, reverb, and the usual tone and volume controls. It&#8217;s really easy to dial in a really nice sound. The reverb actually is very useful, giving the guitar a nice full-bodied sound plugged in.</p>
<p>Well, there you have it:  My #1 acoustic.  Until I save up enough for a nice Martin or Taylor, that is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
