<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian Wahl Band &#187; Gear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianwahlband.com/category/blog/gear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com</link>
	<description>Acoustic Rock</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gear: Martin D-35</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/05/29/gear-martin-d-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/05/29/gear-martin-d-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guitars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is kind of a follow-up to the &#8220;Stuff I want: Martin Acoustic&#8221; post.  I guess I wanted one bad enough that I bought one.
A few weeks ago I stumbled upon a used D-35 in a local shop. The word &#8220;used&#8221; is a stretch, as this thing has hardly a scratch on it. Virtually no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is kind of a follow-up to the &#8220;<a href="http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/2009/04/24/stuff-i-want-martin-acoustic-guitar/">Stuff I want: Martin Acoustic</a>&#8221; post.  I guess I wanted one bad enough that I bought one.</p>
<p>A few weeks ago I stumbled upon a used D-35 in a local shop. The word &#8220;used&#8221; is a stretch, as this thing has hardly a scratch on it. Virtually no fret wear. I&#8217;ve seen many, many guitars hanging on the wall at Guitar Center in worse shape.</p>
<p>Well, I played it for a while &#8211; realizing that, yes, I really do love the Martin sound. I was trying to decide whether I really wanted a Martin or a Taylor &#8211; Martin all the way.</p>
<p>I went back to the shop about a week later and put it on layaway. Got it for $1600, by the way. Not the best deal ever, but this one seemed to have something special &#8211; at least it spoke to me. That was two long weeks ago, and today I brought it home. Another hobby of mine happens to be photography, so here is some eye candy:</p>
<p><iframe width="540" height="500" src="http://www.flickr.com/slideShow/index.gne?set_id=72157618698990823" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>And a bit of a mini-review:</p>
<p><strong>Sound:</strong> I&#8217;m used to my <a href="http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/">Takamine FD-360sc</a>, which is a very nice high-end Takamine. Both guitars are solid spruce top/rosewood back and sides. The Takamine&#8217;s sound is very even and balanced, and a bit on the bright side. When I play these two guitars back-to-back, the Tak just sounds really thin in comparison. The Martin is very warm, and has a beautiful full bottom end that the Takamine just doesn&#8217;t have. Very round sound, too. With new strings, it&#8217;s bright, but it&#8217;s top end still maintains the warm character. Another thing it trumps the Takamine on is punch. If you dig into the Martin, it punches &#8211; hard. It fits my playing style very well (mostly strumming with a pick). When I was comparing to the Taylors (a 414ce), the Taylor sound was nice, but it&#8217;s very bright and jangly. They&#8217;ve got a good bass response, but the overall brightness of the tone wasn&#8217;t what I was going for. Again, the warmth of the Martin won me over.</p>
<p><strong>Playability:</strong> This one was set up with a bit lower action that most factory Martin set-ups I&#8217;ve played. It&#8217;s perfect for my style, as it is pretty easy to chord, but I can strum hard and it doesn&#8217;t buzz. You could probably lower the action a bit if you wanted to. The neck has a satin finish (rest of the guitar is gloss). It seems to get a bit sticky, so I&#8217;ll have to get used to that. The shape of the neck is really nice. Thicker than my Takamine which is good &#8211; I like thick necks &#8211; this is totally a personal preference thing, though. It&#8217;s not quite as comfy in my hands as a Taylor neck, or, say, a vintage Telecaster neck, but it&#8217;s nice. Intonation is as good as any acoustic I&#8217;ve played &#8211; pretty much right on. Another thing, I&#8217;m used to acoustic with cut-aways, and I do play up pretty high on the fretboard sometimes. Another thing I&#8217;ll have to get used to. 90% of the time it won&#8217;t be an issue for me.</p>
<p><strong>Looks/Build:</strong> To me it looks like a guitar should &#8211; simple and elegant. It&#8217;s got a bit of &#8220;bling&#8221; for a Martin, which isn&#8217;t much bling for most manufactures. I like the binding up the neck, and the ornamentation around the sound hole looks classy. The 3-piece back looks awesome, in my opinion. Build quality is as you would expect from a Martin of this caliber &#8211; I&#8217;m not going to worry about it breaking down on me. Also &#8211; I&#8217;ve always loved the look of ebony on the fretboard/bridge. One more thing &#8211; I tend to break a lot of strings. I think I&#8217;d describe my style as &#8220;strum hard and sing harder&#8221;. Hopefully the saddle on this is well-made, as I&#8217;m sure it is. Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/05/29/gear-martin-d-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuff I Want:  Martin Acoustic Guitar</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/24/stuff-i-want-martin-acoustic-guitar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/24/stuff-i-want-martin-acoustic-guitar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I really, really like my Takamine.  It&#8217;s special to me in so many ways.  Still, there are better guitars out there, and every time I play them, I want one.
I used to think it really couldn&#8217;t get any better than Taylor&#8217;s acoustic stuff.  Specifically, a Taylor 614ce.  Let&#8217;s just take a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I really, really like my <a href="http://brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/">Takamine</a>.  It&#8217;s special to me in so many ways.  Still, there are better guitars out there, and every time I play them, I want one.</p>
<p>I used to think it really couldn&#8217;t get any better than Taylor&#8217;s acoustic stuff.  Specifically, a Taylor 614ce.  Let&#8217;s just take a look at one&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Taylor 614ce" src="http://www.taylorguitars.com/Guitars/Shared/Images/Models/614ce-1.jpg" alt="" width="500" /></p>
<p>Pretty&#8230;  It sounds about as good as it looks.  If there&#8217;s one thing about a Taylor that sets it apart, it&#8217;s the way they play.  One word:  effortlessly.  Here&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t like about them.  When you really dig in, which I do a lot as a strummer type player, they don&#8217;t punch &#8211; at least not as much as a&#8230;</p>
<p>Martin.  Yep &#8211; the original, which is where my &#8220;I want THAT guitar&#8221; obsession has gone lately.</p>
<p>I played a few the other day at a local dealer.  Two of them struck me as awesome.  The DC-16rgte Aura, and the DC-28e.</p>
<p>DC-16rgte Aura<br />
<img class="alignnone" title="Martin D-16" src="http://www.thefellowshipofacoustics.com/images1/image/gitaren/1MARTIN-DC-16RGTE-AURA%20004.jpg" alt="" width="300" /></p>
<p>DC-28e<br />
<img class="alignnone" title="D-28" src="http://www.mguitar.com/guitars/choosing/pImages/DC-28E_f.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="499" /></p>
<p>When you dig into a Martin, it punches.  That&#8217;s what I love about them.  Plus, it&#8217;s a Martin.  Enough said.  I played both of these models.  I actually liked the DC-16 model a lot (it&#8217;s a lot cheaper).  I kind of had a Taylor-sounding vibe to it, while still sounding like a Martin.  Very cool.  The D-28 felt better.  At least I liked the neck more&#8230;</p>
<p>So, new I just need to save up $2000-$3000 so I can actually buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/24/stuff-i-want-martin-acoustic-guitar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gear: Vox AC15CC1</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-vox-ac15cc1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-vox-ac15cc1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had an interesting history with amps.  Back in the day I used to be all about modeling stuff &#8211; I guess I thought Line6 was pretty cool.  My first amp ever was a Line6 Spider 1&#215;12.  Man, that thing sounded terrible.  Then I moved up and got a POD 2.0.  Then came a POD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had an interesting history with amps.  Back in the day I used to be all about modeling stuff &#8211; I guess I thought Line6 was pretty cool.  My first amp ever was a Line6 Spider 1&#215;12.  Man, that thing sounded terrible.  Then I moved up and got a POD 2.0.  Then came a POD XT Live.  I never could get those things to sound like real amps.</p>
<p>Somewhere along the line I picked up a Peavey Classic 30, which was a great amp, and I never should have sold it.  But I did, because I guess I thought I wanted a modelling amp.  So, still keeping with the modelling thing, I bought a Vox AD60VT, which is an early Valvetronix &#8220;Blue&#8221; series modelling amp.  It sounded way better than the POD stuff, but it was still a modelling amp.</p>
<p>In December 2008, I decided that my electric guitar tone needed to be pure and simple, and that meant a tube amp.  I always used the &#8220;Vox AC15&#8243; model on my Valvetronix amp, so that&#8217;s what I bought.  Now, Vox makes a couple versions of these.  There is the Custom Classic line, made in China (that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve got).  They&#8217;ve got a stock model, and one with a Celestion Blue speaker, which costs a lot more.  Then there are the hand-wired made in England versions.  They are expensive.  Mine is the Custom Classic line.  How about some photos.</p>
<p>[flickr-gallery mode="photoset" photoset="72157610968103578"]</p>
<p><span id="more-166"></span></p>
<p>I picked up my AC15CC1 used for about $500 used, and it&#8217;s got an Emminence Red Fang speaker in it, which is a nice upgrade.  The Red Fang is a clone of the Celestion Blue.</p>
<p>It sounds nice and chimey, just like a Vox should.  Cleans are great, and when you push it, the amp breaks up really nice.  The speaker upgrade smooths it out a lot on the higher frequencies.  Sounds good with single-coil and humbuckers.</p>
<p>One thing I don&#8217;t like about the amp is the reverb.  It&#8217;s got built-in tremelo (which sounds great) and reverb, but the reverb is pretty nasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-vox-ac15cc1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gear: Takamine FD-360sc</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is my beloved Takamine FD-360sc.  I bought this acoustic back in 2001, which makes it a 2000 model, I think.  I was in college at the time, and I saved long and hard for this.  I remember I had a buddy who had a nice Takamine, and I would always go over to his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my beloved Takamine FD-360sc.  I bought this acoustic back in 2001, which makes it a 2000 model, I think.  I was in college at the time, and I saved long and hard for this.  I remember I had a buddy who had a nice Takamine, and I would always go over to his dorm room and play it.</p>
<p>First, here are some photos:</p>
<p><iframe width="540" height="500" src="http://www.flickr.com/slideShow/index.gne?set_id=72157601576930749" frameBorder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p><span id="more-161"></span>I love this guitar.  If there were a fire in my house, I&#8217;d probably run in after it.  You can see this thing in action in most of my vidoes.</p>
<p>Here are a few spec&#8217;s:</p>
<p>Top:  Spruce (solid)<br />
Back/Sides:  Rosewood (solid)<br />
Fretboard:  Rosewood<br />
Electronics:  Takamine AD-1 Digital system</p>
<p>And a bit of a review&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Sound</strong>: I love the sound &#8211; I would describe it as clear, slightly bright, and very balanced. The bass tones and the treble tones mix perfectly, in my opinion. It&#8217;s fairly loud &#8211; good projection. It is really a joy to play and hear &#8211; one of those acoustics that is inspiring to play.</p>
<p><strong>Playability</strong>: The neck is on the thinner side. This is a preference thing, but I&#8217;m used to it and like it. It is very comfy. The rosewood board on this thing is awesome. Very tight grain and feels nice and smooth &#8211; a bit of a soft feel to it, but not slow. I&#8217;ve cleaned it with 000 steel wool and oiled it with lemon oil every 9 months to a year &#8211; it&#8217;s a great neck. I&#8217;ve set it up for the style that I play. The action is low &#8211; but not really low. I&#8217;m a strummer, so I like the action just a tad higher than some. Intonation is perfect.</p>
<p><strong>Build quality</strong>. I just gave this guitar a cleaning and fretboard conditioning the other day &#8211; and I once again gave it a thorough inspection. I simply cannot find one flaw in it at all &#8211; besides the ones I&#8217;ve put in it myself. The wood grain is perfect &#8211; none of the sanding marks I can see on my Fender Tele. The double binding is flawless. Joints are perfect. No visible glue. It is an example of great craftsmanship. One thing I&#8217;ve always loved about it is the weight. I&#8217;ve picked up some guitars that just felt like a bag of bricks. This one is nice and light &#8211; not too light. It can feel a bit on the &#8220;delicate&#8221; side, but not too much so. Just enough that you want to treat it with care.</p>
<p><strong>Electronics</strong>. Everybody says that Takamine&#8217;s are built to be plugged in. This one is no exception (though it sounds better unplugged, in my opinion). It&#8217;s got some fancy electronics on it, allowing you to adjust feedback response, reverb, and the usual tone and volume controls. It&#8217;s really easy to dial in a really nice sound. The reverb actually is very useful, giving the guitar a nice full-bodied sound plugged in.</p>
<p>Well, there you have it:  My #1 acoustic.  Until I save up enough for a nice Martin or Taylor, that is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2009/04/20/gear-takamine-fd-360sc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Camera &#8211; HD!</title>
		<link>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2008/09/01/new-camera-hd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2008/09/01/new-camera-hd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianwahlband.brianwahl.org/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I picked up a new camera &#8211; an Canon HV20.  I&#8217;ve been doing videos with the built-in iSight on my laptop.  Expect the video quality to jump dramatically.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked up a new camera &#8211; an Canon HV20.  I&#8217;ve been doing videos with the built-in iSight on my laptop.  Expect the video quality to jump dramatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brianwahlband.com/2008/09/01/new-camera-hd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
